我质询一下Neon，我有什么利益？我完全做义工，你们利益集团如果直接针对我，都不让我质询了，好的，我就不质询了。你上来就大谈我针对western社区，这种道德绑架和Tunnr当年说我一个人十字军东征一样，我的利益只有CKB，CKB又是我自己花钱买的，而不是团队给我发的。
既然没有管理办法，要去中心化，谁的项目谁申请这个逻辑都不行，也真是去中心化了，验明正身都不做了。
即使验明正身的ADA合作项目，也半途而废了。技术合作就算了，做好宣传就行了。
我不明白，我这种没有利益的，也成了你们攻击的对象，因为影响到你们的利益了？我点了Cat++的支持，就质询我在Cat++有利益。
好吧，那么建议以后所有的质询都匿名进行，这样谁也别影响谁？改进制度？
你们倒是提改进制度建议啊。我之前提了招标分层，管办分离。天天KOL还想改变世界？我真服了。
我的利益除了亏损了CKB价格，没有其他了。
我明白你對我們團隊擔心，我們是東方的項目，我們希望與Nervos Community 建立一個良好的互信關係。
項目撥款是階段性，我們透過定期匯報，去更新我們的進度，希望大家支持。
So now you are playing victim because I spoke about the perception you give in public? No one is allowed to question you in other words like you question others? You are not coming across well in the convo 
兄弟，是他来挑战我为什么质疑Neon的提案，二支持你们，给我贴标签。我其实是怕DAO资金由第三方申请会在执行层面扯皮，这种事我见过一大堆。
他如果这么说，我想你们的机会来了。
我支持任何为CKB贡献的项目，但是预算尽量花在实处这个愿景很难，毕竟监管太弱，所以我期望你们总预算可以切成两期或者三期申请，一期做好了再申请一次，这样多几个审批，也让大家多投几次票，虽然麻烦点，至少可以检验一下之前的工作。
现在连项目变更都没有，只能一根筋的往下走。
你啊，先干出点业绩给大家看看。对了，我的CKBULL钱包里面的66个CKB 1年多了都提不出来，帮助给解决一下啊。
No I dont actually care about that proposal or Neon for that matter. Its more of a consistency thing. What I care about is you cannot accept criticism and yet you give it out to others 
Im just letting you know that not all of us will just sit back whilst you pick and choose morals to apply which suits only you.
What does this even mean? haha
你自己看看你今天的帖子顺序，上来一句western。我理你们了？
你要明白事，还是提制度改进意见吧。
Yeah don’t quite follow you there either. Firstly I came to ask you why you was being lenient to this project in specific, (yours was the first reply I was replying too) then I posted my opinion on why I would or wouldn’t vote for this project after reading everyone else’s. Was highly surprised you had little to say in comparison to EVERY other project asking for less money. If your comment wasn’t even on here, I wouldn’t have just said ‘oh lets pick on or attack Woodbury today’ . So the fact you are accusing me of attacking you is laughable. If anything, it was noticing inconsistency. I thought you’d been kidnapped by aliens or owned cat++ or initially or because it was geography. Crying victim won’t get you anywhere in life. In fact I have a lot of respect for your criticism in general. again it was surprising
我什么受害了？你读你第一篇。
连质询都不能质询了？
我还不能表达自己意见了？
你说的西方社区就是完全意见了？
我也不愿意管，你说的对，因为没有利益。
CKB也没给我钱，我是投资者散户，既然不让我质询，我应该骂CKB为什么这么傻屌？或者CKB为什么这么牛逼？
我在公司质询过包括IBM HP SUN SAP还有很多西方公司，而且IBM HP SUN之类的公司每年都质询，也没人说我质询有错啊？我们公司领导都让我质询，质询的越深刻越好，越能暴露问题越好。怎么你就针对我不让我质询呢？不让质询的人，都是有问题的人，不让问肯定有原因啊，你们社区的钱？动了你们蛋糕了？
我代表谁的利益？
请你仔细思考回答。
Harm you? lol what are you talking about?
Who said you cant ask questions? Im expressing you have not asked as many on this project despite there being flaws!! This has to be a translation problem surely.
What questions are you asking me? I’ve not translated one direct question from you, what would you like to know about me?
装傻充愣没用。瞎攻击。
我真是浪费时间精力在无用的人身上，连个最简单的申报人资质问题都看不懂。
LMAO don’t play victim. You basically can’t accept being confronted on inconsistency. Blind attack…good one!!! I’ll remember that when someone pulls me up on being inconsistent.
送你两句中国古诗：”海纳百川，有容乃大。壁立千仞，无欲则刚。“
我受害者角色？扯蛋。还让我去团队骂人么？
Perhaps you should take note of others criticisms of you then instead of only wanting to criticise others. The next time you criticise any project, perhaps people will say you’re attacking a project. Thats effectively what you are saying to me for criticising your consistency.
Hi @crookednervosness @woodbury.bit , I would like to kindly remind everyone that here is the place to discuss the RGBCAT (CAT++) proposal. It’s important that we stay on topic and refrain from deviating into unrelated subjects or engaging in personal attacks. The previous discussion ends here. Let’s keep the conversation constructive and respectful. Thank you.
我想温馨提醒一下，这里是讨论 RGBCAT（CAT++）提案的地方。请避免偏题或进行人身攻击，之前的讨论到此结束，让我们保持建设性和尊重的对话。谢谢。
P.S.
Hi @woodbury.bit ，更新一下 CKBull 钱包，新版本 CKBull 已经支持提取所有余额了，我前几天试了一下可行的。
相信catpp的技术能力，对catpp的艺术审美很有信心，从网站的设计精美程度就看得出来，相信能有一个好的输出
great team
Great team, great project!
CAT++ to the moon!