Hi Poshboytl,
Thank you so much for this incredibly valuable clarification and for sharing the historical context of DAO v1.0. Your perspective as a rule designer and committee member is exactly what this discussion needed, and we appreciate it immensely.
Your analysis of the DAO’s current state, stuck in a low-efficiency “gridlock”, is spot on and perfectly captures the problem we are trying to solve.
We would also like to inform you that we have taken the community’s feedback to heart. After an in-depth and productive discussion with Matt and Jordan yesterday and considering the community voice, we will be officially reclassifying our v1.1 proposal as a Meta-Rule Change Proposal today. We agree that this is the most principled way forward.
As you said, builders are scarce, and progress sometimes requires bold attempts. We are taking a chance and presenting our complete, focused v1.1 package to the community for a meta-rule vote, because we believe, like you, that a bold experiment is better than continued stagnation.
As Jan also put it, even if the proposal doesn’t pass, it’s not the end of the world; our perseverance in finding ways to improve the DAO is what matters.
We would be honored to have your support in rallying the community for this crucial vote. Let’s work together to turn our shared resources into tangible outcomes.
Hi Poshboytl,
非常感谢您为我们带来了极其宝贵的澄清，并分享了 DAO v1.0 的历史背景。您作为规则制定者和管委会成员的视角，正是这场讨论所需要的，我们对此感激不尽。
您对 DAO 当前陷入低效“僵局”的分析一针见血，完美地概括了我们正试图解决的问题。
我们还想告诉您，我们已经将社区的反馈铭记于心。在昨天与 Matt 和 Jordan 进行了深入且富有成效的讨论，并考虑到社区的声音后，我们将在今天正式将 v1.1 提案重新归类为“元规则修改提案”。我们同意这是最有原则的前进方式。
正如您所说，builder 是稀缺的，而进步有时需要勇敢的尝试。我们正选择“搏一把”，将我们完整的、聚焦的 v1.1 方案，交付给社区进行一次元规则投票。因为我们和您一样相信，一次勇敢的试验，远胜于持续的停滞。
正如 Jan 指出的那样：
如果能在接下来的关键投票中得到您的支持，我们将倍感荣幸。让我们一起努力，将我们共同的资源，转化为切实的成果。