there is absolutely a misunderstanding here.
The DAO v1.1 proposal laid out processes for milestone approval. These are the rule-based standards I refer to.
The DAO v1.1 team was created and funded to facilitate DAO activities. DAO activities are not being facilitated by the v1.1 team, but rather we have here an appeal to someone else to “do something” to stop legitimate questions about the effort and exercise power outside of the rules of the DAO.
There is absolutely nothing stopping the DAO v1.1 team from following the procedures they laid out (and some of us spent hours discussing) regarding milestone approval.
This conflict significantly escalated following a premature “mainnet launch” post, which seemingly disregards DAO rules established in v1.1 regarding milestone approval.
Baiyu has graciously tried to navigate the conflict by delaying, however, members of the v1.1 team are not following this lead. The community is in turn being divided and the door is being opened for long standing tension (like what you are expressing) to come to the surface.
I apologize for any misunderstandings you have encountered due to translation issues, however it would benefit all of us to presume the best of intentions in each other.