Let’s say a group of 4 members require 10M CKBs for their collective proposal, they will need 30M CKBs for the grant approval. If each of them possess 7.5M CKBs each (minimum), they can already self-vote and pass the 51% approval and receive the grant in current circumstance; where there are lack of interest from CKB community to vote. We need a transparency. It will create a negativity within the community if this happens.
So far, no wallets in the CKB metaforo.io hold enough CKBs to prevent this happening. We need a contingent solution to this @janx .
It just requires more DAO depositors to vote
where there are lack of interest from CKB community to vote.
The assumption here is that if community members don’t vote, there is a high probability that the proposer will have to vote themselves pass the proposal.
There is almost no way to secure funding when little people vote.
That’s why it’s crucial to increase promotion to get community members to vote (either against or for).
I think we need work on the promotion work together. (Thanks for point out the issue.)
It will create a negativity within the community if this happens.
If something like this does happen, it’s not necessarily an entirely negative thing. It’s even difficult to avoid in the process of community growth. Use such an event to inform the community in order to get the community to vote together and come together to protect community funds.
In the long run, perhaps a gradual move to a representative democracy-like solution is an option and an institutional approach to solving this problem. Because as proposals become more numerous, not every community member will have the time to vote on every proposal. And getting a trusted delegate to help vote is a option.
“Let the bullets fly for a while…”