首先要说明的是，这个基本功能BUG问题是我第一个测试出来“报错提示”并发送给测试组的，有Telegram记录可以证明，当然，还有我提供的其他报错目前还没被证实解决。所以当Neon提出了他的疑问以后，我发现我之前太相信社区关于你们的正面宣传，选择了盲从，而失去了自由思辨。
Firstly, it should be noted that I was the first to test and identify the ‘error message’ bug in the basic functionality, which I reported to the test group. This can be proven with Telegram records. Of course, other errors I reported have not yet been confirmed as resolved. Therefore, when Neon raised his concerns, I realized that I had been too trusting of the community’s positive promotion about you and had chosen to follow blindly, losing my free and independent thought.
没有回答核心问题，没有任何证明有能力将铭文推起来。前期参与者获得收益，如果没有核心的单一目标铭文推广运营能力，依然会重蹈覆辙。我最近一直在听铭文社区的各种宣传，我觉得大部分预算应该用在铭文社区的建设和单一目标铭文的曝光上，否则，这么多铭文平台，能够成功的有几个？
There’s no response addressing the core issue; there is no proof of the capability to successfully promote inscriptions. Early participants might profit, but without the core focus of inscription promotion and operational capabilities, it’s likely to repeat past mistakes. I’ve been listening to various promotions in the inscription community recently, and I believe that most of the budget should be allocated to building the inscription community and focusing on the exposure of targeted inscriptions. Otherwise, with so many inscription platforms, how many can truly succeed?
社区建设，需要更详细的计划。对于铭文赛道来说，我的理解是社区建设远远比平台建设重要。
希望贵团队展现出更强的实力，让我们散户投资者更相信你们。
Community development requires a more detailed plan. In my view, for the inscription sector, community development is far more important than platform development.
I hope your team can demonstrate stronger capabilities to instill greater confidence in us, the retail investors.
作为CKB支持者，以及被深度套牢散户，我当然希望有更多更好的CKB生态项目。但是CKB之前太多的生态Grand失败项目，以及我十几年前做过几年IT预算专项审核累计审核过几个亿人民币的IT预算，大量经验告诉我，在没有足够文本以及实例支撑的情况下，预算要分步一步一步发放。虽然目前 CKB社区太盼望铭文项目了，但是要考虑到CKB生态项目失败次数的太多，不能再轻易失败了。借用电影“投名状”里的一幕，掌管仅剩下1500战士的将军死活不参加战斗，直到确定这场战役可以赢。“我们太需要一场胜利了”。
每个社区成员都有义务保护社区资金，不论对谁的项目都一视同仁，才能让CKB活下去。
基于此，我建议贵项目组可以一期要2万美元以下的预算（项目总额的1/3以下），执行交付后，在申请项目的二期、三期预算，已达到项目整体稳定可控的目的。
As a CKB supporter and a retail investor deeply trapped in losses, I naturally hope for more and better CKB ecosystem projects. However, given the numerous failed projects in the CKB ecosystem before, and drawing from my experience of several years in IT budget special audit, having audited several hundred million RMB in IT budgets, my extensive experience tells me that the budget should be released step by step, especially when there is insufficient textual support and examples. Although the CKB community is currently very eager for inscription projects, considering the numerous failures in CKB ecosystem projects, we cannot afford another easy failure.Drawing an analogy from a scene in the movie ‘The Warlords’, where a general in charge of only 1500 soldiers refuses to join the battle until he is sure it can be won, as ‘We desperately need a victory’.
Every community member has a duty to protect the community funds. Treating every project equally is essential to ensure the survival of CKB.
Based on this, I suggest that your project team could request a budget of less than 20,000 USD for the first phase (less than a third of the total project amount). After delivering this phase, you could then apply for the budget for the second and third phases, to ensure the overall stability and controllability of the project.
补充一点: Spore Protocol这个项目只要了51万个CKB吧 这个要1800万个CKB 横向对标又是一个不平等项目 如果这个预算金额通过 Spore项目组开发的兄弟们怎么看？人家还露脸了。 [DIS] Spore Protocol Mainnet Launch Sponsorship Proposal | Spore Protocol 上主网赞助提案
PS: The Spore Protocol project only requested 510,000 CKB, while this one is asking for 18 million CKB. This presents an unequal comparison when benchmarked horizontally. How would the developers of the Spore project, who have even shown their faces, view this if such a budget is approved?