v1.1 投票更新 & 关键社区讨论 (2025-10-28)
大家好，
DAO v1.1 提案的最终投票正在 Metaforo 上进行中。首先，非常感谢已经投出宝贵一票的社区成员！
投票情况同步： 在投票开始的24小时内，我们欣喜地看到社区展现出了前所未有的关注度。
- 投票进度： 目前总票数已达到 140,803,069 CKB，距离 1.85 亿的门槛已完成了 76.1%。
- 赞成率： 当前赞成票占比为 46.97%。
- 参与人数： 已有 15 位社区成员参与投票，其参与情况，已超过过去一年任一次元规则修改提案。
这说明社区对 DAO 未来的高度关切，无论最终结果如何，这都是一次成功的治理实践。
持续问答更新：一场关于 DAO 核心瓶颈的讨论
在 Metaforo 的投票页面上，一位社区成员提出了一个深刻且极具挑战性的反对意见。本着促进信息传播的原则，我们将这场重要的对话同步到这里，希望能让所有社区成员都能参与到这场思考中。
问：提案的核心前提，“有很多潜在的建设者被 v1.0 的流程卡住了”，并未得到证实。生态当前更可能的问题是“建设者稀缺”，而非“建设者被卡住”。因此，优化一个流入不足的管道（治理流程），不如将精力直接用于孵化和吸引建设者。
答： 这是一个最关键的问题。我们认为，大量数据表明：**我们当前失效的治理框架，正在主动地制造建设者稀缺”现象。
我们观察到：
-
Talk 论坛上的提案：2023年有23个，2024年有19个，数量上并未出现明显下跌。然而，2023年提案的浏览量中位数是 1500 次，而2024年骤降至 437 次，仅为原来的三分之一。这意味着，当新的建设者带着想法来到这里时，他们的提案从一开始就无法获得必要的关注。
-
在2024年，有9个提案由社区外的团队成员发起，相比10个由社区内团队成员发起的提案，没有明显数量差别。但没有一个外部提案成功通过了 Talk 论坛的点赞阶段进入投票（在这里我想说明，这仅是对治理流程的分析，不评判任何项目本身的情况）。 其中一些团队，在发布提案后，苦等2个月，只收到了2条社区回复。这说明，缺少了必要的信息传递路径，一定程度会影响建设者的想法落地。
-
DAO 成立至今，总计只有87人参与过投票。其中，有35人在2023年后停止投票，33人在2024年后停止投票。 我们活跃的治理核心正在萎缩。一个和我们这次提案响应建设者呼声，引入USDI计价相关的例子是：2024年一个关于将资助计价改为 USD 的元规则提案，获得了 100% 的赞成票，却因为总票数未达到1.85亿的门槛（90,411,228/185,000,000）而失败。
可见，即使社区有明确的共识和有助于建设者的需求，我们当前的系统也无法将共识传递到足够多的治理者并转化为行动。 -
此外，一个鲜活的例子：就在上个月，CKBoost 在交付了里程碑后，却迟迟得不到支付，因为 v1.0 缺乏一个清晰的流程来处理此事。 这种挫败感，正在真实地伤害着每一个为生态贡献的建设者。
与之相对， 这次V1.1提案，通过模拟我们提议的流程：积极地沟通、澄清、迭代，我们这次的投票，在过去半天中激活了多个沉寂的治理参与者，甚至吸引了3位全新的成员来投票。 这证明了一个更好的流程，能够直接带来更高的参与度。
“工欲善其事，必先利其器”
我们相信，一个工匠如果斧头钝了，他最该做的不是更拼命地砍树，而是停下来，先把斧头磨快。
（完整的回复，请见 Metaforo 上的回应。）
我们欢迎所有人的观点。投票仍在继续，你的一票至关重要。
请前往 Metaforo 投出你的一票： https://dao.ckb.community/thread/vot-community-fund-dao-v1-1-web5-community-fund-dao-v1-1-web5-optimization-proposal-64083
v1.1 Vote Update & Key Community Discussion`
Hello everyone,
The final vote for the DAO v1.1 proposal is currently underway on Metaforo. First, a huge thank you to all the community members who have already cast their valuable votes!
Voting Status Update: In the first 24 hours of voting, we’ve seen an incredible level of engagement from the community.
- Quorum Progress: The total votes cast have reached 140,803,069 CKB, which is 76.1% of the 185M CKB quorum.
- Approval Rate: The current approval rate is 46.97%.
- Participation: 15 community members have already voted. This level of participation has already surpassed any meta-rule proposal from the past year.
This demonstrates the community’s deep concern for the DAO’s future. Regardless of the final outcome, this is a successful governance event.
Ongoing Q&A Update: A Discussion on the DAO’s Core Bottleneck
On the Metaforo voting page, a community member has raised a profound and challenging objection, sparking a crucial debate about the DAO’s core bottleneck. To facilitate communication, we are syncing this important conversation here so that all community members can take part in this reflection.
Q: Many potential builders are being blocked by the v1.0 process is unproven. The more likely problem is that “builders are scarce,” not “builders are blocked.” Therefore, optimizing an empty pipeline (the governance process) is a lower priority than directly incubating and attracting builders.
A: This is the most critical question. We believe a significant amount of data shows that our current, failing governance framework is actively creating the phenomenon of scarce builders.
We’ve observed that:
-
Proposals on the Talk forum: There were 23 in 2023 and 19 in 2024, not a dramatic drop. However, the median view count for proposals in 2023 was 1,500. In 2024, it plummeted to 437, roughly a third of what it was. This means when new builders arrive, their proposals fail to get the necessary attention from day one.
-
In 2024, 9 proposals were initiated by team members from outside the community, a number not significantly different from the 10 proposals initiated by internal community members. However, not a single one of the external proposals successfully made it past the Talk forum’s like-gate to a formal vote. (I want to clarify here that this is purely an analysis of the governance process and not a judgment on any specific project itself.) Some of these teams waited 2 months to receive only 2 replies from the community. This indicates that the lack of a necessary path and process for information dissemination can, to some extent, hinder a builder’s idea from coming to fruition.
-
Since the DAO’s inception, only 87 individuals have ever participated in a vote. Of those, 35 have not voted after 2023, and 33 have not voted after 2024. Our active governance core is shrinking. A perfect example, relevant to our proposal’s inclusion of USDI, is the 2024 meta-rule proposal to use USD amounts for DAO payments. It received 100% YES votes yet failed because the turnout (90,411,228 / 185,000,000) did not meet the quorum. This shows that even when there is a clear consensus on a builder-friendly need, our current system fails to mobilize enough participation to turn that consensus into action.
-
And another real-world example: just last month, the CKBoost delivered a milestone but was left waiting for payment because v1.0 lacks a clear process to handle it. This frustration is actively harming the very builders who are contributing to the ecosystem.
In contrast, the v1.1 proposal process has simulated the very flow we are advocating for: active communication, clarification, and iteration. As a result, in just the last half-day, our vote has reactivated several long-dormant voters and even attracted 3 brand new participants. This demonstrates that a better process directly leads to better engagement.
An old saying goes:
“A craftsman who wishes to do his work well must first sharpen his tools.”
If an axe is dull, the right move isn’t to chop harder, but to stop and sharpen the axe.
(For the full response, please visit Metaforo.)
We welcome all perspectives. The vote continues, and every single vote is crucial.
Please cast your vote on Metaforo https://dao.ckb.community/thread/vot-community-fund-dao-v1-1-web5-community-fund-dao-v1-1-web5-optimization-proposal-64083
修正后投票结果：提案以 75.2% 赞成票通过。
