Hi everyone, I wanted to share two reflections I’ve had after this whole v1.1 process:
-
This vote had the highest turnout in the DAO’s history, which proves that our community is still absolutely capable of mobilizing for governance. However, as we saw with the voter “Trust” (who only found out about the vote via a WeChat article a few days before the end), this flow of governance action requires a good information flow as a prerequisite.
-
The Metaforo exploit, whether or not it ultimately distorted the vote, might prove that even if we don’t change a single v1.0 rule, the community needs a safer governance tool we can trust.
我自己在过去1个多月推进1.1的过程中,其实有两点感触蛮深的:
-
这次投票的高参与度,说明社区依然能组织起治理的行动流。就像Trust他虽然一开始投了NO,但也坦诚是在通过我们各种渠道的信息沟通,才看到这个投票。所以治理的行动流需要良好的信息流作为前提保障
-
metaforo存在的漏洞无论是否造成了投票被扭曲,都说明即使完全不改1.0的规则,社区也需要一个更安全的治理工具
Thanks