Hi everyone, I don’t use voice or video channels, also I’m not on social media. I’m much more at ease writing, so I’ll keep responding here as usual 
Challenge to Milestone Deadline & Project Stalls
I agree that points 2 and 3 look reasonable, but I want to push back on point 1:
I don’t know, but in my eyes milestone deadlines just create artificial pressure that encourages rushing, cutting corners, and deferring important work. Not the best match for our industry. Also, when a milestone is missed, teams can stall, waiting for decisions or approvals, which creates bottlenecks and lost momentum.
So my question are:
- How deadlines benefit the broader ecosystem?
- What Being Empowered means with a couple of concrete examples?
- How much decision-making authority will stewards actually have?
- What data or evidence led to choosing a 30-day deadline?
- Why was 30 days chosen instead of 60, 120, or 240 days?
- What are the risks or downsides of waiting even a full year to see whether the project can deliver?
A Couple Questions on Voting
- Will the CKB price at submission time (30+7 days before funds release) always be used to weight CKB votes for USDi proposals?
- Can the presenting team still choose when the on-chain vote begins, or must it start automatically at the end of the 30-day period?
Re-Evaluate Meta Rule Vote Rules
How was the 185M CKB threshold originally chosen as the quorum for a meta-rule vote, and does that rationale still apply today?
Love & Peace, Phroi %118