Update & Path Forward (Sept 12): Community Review Month Begins!
Hello everyone,
Great news! Our proposal has successfully passed the first stage with 32 likes on the first post. A huge thank you to everyone who participated in the rigorous and constructive debates over the past week. It’s this level of engagement that makes our community strong.
As we promised, this isn’t a rush to the vote. First stage pass officially kicks off our one-month extended community review period. We want to ensure this meta-rule change has the broadest possible consensus.
To start this new phase, we’ve put together a short video to summarize the core problem and our proposed solution. We hope it makes the v1.1 vision clearer for everyone.
We encourage you to watch the video, continue to ask the tough questions in this thread, and help us refine this proposal. Over the next month, we will announce dates for community AMAs for our community.
Let’s use this time to build a rock-solid consensus and create a better DAO, together.
舟舟
On behalf of the v1.1 Proposal Team
Ongoing Q&A Update (As of Sept 12)
In the spirit of continued transparency, we’ll use this section to address key questions that come up during the review month.
Q1: Your proposal offers a choice between CKB and USDI/USD funding. Doesn’t allowing proposers to choose a fixed CKB amount let them “gamble” with DAO funds? If the CKB price rises they win big, and if it falls, the project might fail, leaving the DAO with the loss.
A1: The risk you’ve highlighted is real, which is precisely why we designed a multi-option system: to provide flexibility while mitigating that exact risk.
Our main goal is to lower barriers for builders. Here’s how the options address different needs and prevent “gambling”:
-
Fixed USDI/USD: This is for teams that need absolute budget stability for their operational costs.
-
Fixed CKB: This is for long-term CKB believers who are comfortable managing the volatility themselves.
-
Fixed USD Value (Paid in CKB): This is the crucial “safety net” option designed for the very scenario you described. A team can request a USD-denominated budget but receive payment in CKB. If the CKB price drops, the DAO tops up the payment to ensure the project receives the full USD value needed for that milestone. This protects the project from market risk without forcing them to abandon CKB.
This system empowers builders to choose the model that best fits their needs while ensuring they have the financial stability to deliver on their promises to the DAO.
更新与前进路径 (9月12日): 社区问询月正式开启!
大家好，
向大家报告一个好消息：我们的提案在第一个帖子中获得了 32 个赞，成功通过了第一阶段！非常感谢每一位在过去一周里参与了严谨且富有建设性辩论的朋友。正是这种深度的参与，让我们的社区充满力量。
正如我们所承诺的，我们不会急于进入投票。7填30赞的达成，也正式开启了我们为期一个月的社区深度问询期。我们希望确保这次的元规则修改，能够获得最广泛的社区共识。
为了更好地开启这个新阶段，我们制作了一个短视频，旨在总结我们面临的核心问题、v1.1 的解决方案，以及这次升级对我们每个人的意义。
我们鼓励大家观看视频，并在这个帖子下继续提出犀利的问题，帮助我们进一步完善提案。在接下来的一个月里，我们也会公布面向社区的多场 AMA 活动信息。
让我们利用这段时间，建立坚如磐石的共识，共同打造一个更好的 DAO。
舟舟
谨代表 v1.1 提案团队
持续问答更新 (截至9月12日)
本着持续透明的精神，我们将在为期一个月的审议期内，继续通过这个版块回应社区的关键问题。
问题一：提案提供了 CKB 和 USDI/USD 计价的选项。允许提案人选择固定 CKB 数额，是否会让他们用 DAO 的资金来“赌”CKB 价格？如果价格上涨，他们就大赚一笔；如果价格下跌，项目可能因此失败，最终风险由 DAO 承担。
回答一： 您指出的风险是真实存在的，而这也恰恰是我们设计多元化选项系统的原因：既提供灵活性，又精准地去管理您提到的这种风险。
我们目前的首要目标是降低建设者的门槛。以下是这些选项如何满足不同需求并规避“赌博”风险的：
-
固定 USDI/USD 计价： 为那些需要绝对预算稳定性的团队准备，确保运营成本可控。
-
固定 CKB 计价： 为那些 CKB 的长期信仰者准备，他们愿意并能够自己管理价格波动。
-
固定 USD 价值 (以 CKB 支付)： 这是我们为应对您提到的场景而设计的关键 “安全网”。团队可以申请一个以 USD 计价的预算，但以 CKB 接收资金。如果 CKB 价格下跌，DAO 将会补足差额，确保项目方在每个里程碑都能收到足额的 USD 价值。这既保护了项目免受市场风险影响，也让他们不必完全放弃 CKB。
这个系统的设计初衷是为建设者赋能，确保他们有足够的财务稳定性来兑现对 DAO 的承诺。