持续问答更新 Ongoing Q&A Updates (9.5)
持续问答更新（截止9月6日）
Hi，
今天的讨论非常精彩、严谨，这正是一个健康的 DAO 所需要的。为了帮助每一位成员都能跟上节奏，并让对话更有焦点，我们想在此对已经出现的核心议题做一个小结。
DAO 应该如何进化？
基于社区成员富有洞察力的反馈，目前浮现出两种主要的治理哲学：
-
路径 A：原则性的整体变革。 这种观点认为，任何显著的变更，包括 v1.1 中的运营性变更，都已触及 DAO 的宪法。因此，最负责任的方式是直面这一点，启动一次元规则修改投票，并可能借此机会一并解决 USD 计价/ICKB整合等其他重大问题。这条路径的优先事项是程序的完整性和全面的改革，即使这意味着过程会更慢、更复杂。
-
路径 B：务实的迭代演进。 这是我们 v1.1 提案所倡导的路径。它主张我们首先通过一个聚焦的、快速的、低风险的项目，来解决当前最紧迫的运营危机（工具、服务缺失）。这条路径优先考虑可见的进展和持续的迭代。
我们为何选择路径 B，以及我们需要您的智慧
我们团队已经阐明了我们选择路径 B 的初衷，在此我们想更深入地解释为什么我们认为“聚焦”是此刻更重要的事。
我们选择路径 B，是因为我们坚信，试图在一个提案中解决所有问题，是导致治理停滞的根源之一。像稳定币计价、iCKB 集成等议题，每一个都极其重要，但也极其复杂，都值得拥有它们自己的、专注的、高质量的辩论。
v1.1 提案的范围是刻意且狭窄的：只专注于修复 DAO 的运营框架和工具。我们希望社区能在一个个小的边界内做决策迭代。
即便最终社区认为v1.1提案需要通过元规则的门槛来投票，我们投票的内容，也仅仅是关于“是否要资助这个运营优化项目”，而不应包含其他可以解耦的议题。
我们认为，一个功能更完善的 DAO，未来将能更好地处理那些重大的宪法级辩论。
这是一个需要整个社区来做的决定。您更倾向于哪条路径？
您的观点至关重要，将直接影响我们下一步的方向。我们在这里倾听。
Ongoing Q&A Update (As of Sept 6)
Hi everyone,
Today’s discussion has been insightful and rigorous, exactly what a healthy DAO needs. To help every member keep up and to focus the conversation, we’d like to summarize the core themes that have emerged.
How Should the DAO Evolve?
Based on insightful feedback from community members, two main governance philosophies have emerged:
-
Path A: Principled, Comprehensive Reform. This view holds that any significant change, including the operational ones in v1.1, already touches the DAO’s constitution. Therefore, the most responsible path is to face this directly, initiate a meta-rule vote, and potentially use this opportunity to resolve other major issues like USD denomination/iCKB integration at the same time. The priority here is procedural integrity and comprehensive reform, even if it means a slower, more complex process.
-
Path B: Pragmatic, Iterative Evolution. This is the path our v1.1 proposal advocates for. It argues that we could first solve the most urgent operational crisis (the lack of tools and services) through a focused, fast, and low-risk project. This path prioritizes visible progress and continuous iteration.
Why We Chose Path B, and Why We Need Your Wisdom
Our team has explained our rationale for choosing Path B, and here we want to elaborate on why we believe focus is what matters most right now.
We chose Path B because we firmly believe that trying to solve every problem in a single proposal is one of the root causes of governance inertia. Issues like stablecoin denomination and iCKB integration are each incredibly important, but also incredibly complex, and they each deserve their own focused, high-quality debates.
The scope of the v1.1 proposal is intentionally narrow: to focus exclusively on fixing the DAO’s operational framework and tooling. We want the community to make decisions within small, defined boundaries, one iteration at a time.
Even if the community ultimately decides that the v1.1 proposal must pass the meta-rule threshold, the vote itself should still be exclusively about “whether to fund this operational upgrade project,” and should not be bundled with other, decouplable topics.
We believe a more functional DAO will be better equipped to handle those major constitutional debates in the future.
This should be a decision for the entire community. Which path do you favor?
Your perspective is crucial and will directly influence our next steps. We are here to listen.