One question, though: why is a project passing your audits deemed “good enough to publish”?
Community audits are obviously welcome, but under what circumstances can we change a proposal’s milestone delivery from “pending” to “accepted”? This is not only about DAO v1.1, but it’s also crucial for future proposals. In the future, can I also ask other proposers to pass my audits before their milestones are deemed acceptable?
If there’s a role assigned to you explicitly or implicitly to do this, then I guess it would be better for you to publicly state it. Otherwise, this situation actually confirms my concerns expressed in this post, “who represents the community?” and “how to verify milestone?”.
BTW, it’s actually quite good to see that there are finally some semi-rules determining the acceptance of a milestone; I’m just concerned that these rules are set arbitrarily.