感谢大家的讨论。作为 DAO 协调员，我先说一下目前的规则情况和技术方向。
规则层面： v1.0 规则在创建投票的操作指引中要求勾选"Show who voted"，但并没有一条专门针对"投票者身份是否必须公开"的正式元规则。即将上线的 v1.1 规则同样没有对此做出明确规定。
技术层面： 关于钱包验证和身份绑定，v1.1 平台采用基于 Web5 的技术架构，以 did:ckb 作为核心身份体系，投票权重直接从链上 Nervos DAO 存款读取。这意味着投票者的身份和权重在链上本身是可验证的。不过关于平台具体的实现细节（如投票记录的可见性、DID 的展示方式等），可以请 @_magicsheep 补充说明。
如果社区成员认为有必要就"投票者隐私与治理透明度之间的平衡"建立明确规则，按照治理流程，可以发起一项元规则修改提案，交由社区投票决定。
Thanks for the discussion. As the DAO coordinator, let me share where things stand on both the rules and the technical side.
On the rules side: The v1.0 rules include “Show who voted: checked” as part of the poll setup instructions on Metaforo, but there is no formal meta-rule specifically addressing whether voter identity must be publicly disclosed. The upcoming v1.1 rules likewise do not include a dedicated provision on this matter.
On the technical side: Regarding wallet verification and identity binding, the v1.1 platform is built on a Web5 architecture with did:ckb as the core identity system, where voting weight is read directly from on-chain Nervos DAO deposits. This means voter identity and weight are inherently verifiable on-chain. For the specifics of how this is implemented on the platform (e.g., visibility of voting records, display of voter DIDs), I invite @_magicsheep to provide further details.
If the community feels it is necessary to establish a clear rule on the balance between voter privacy and governance transparency, the appropriate path under the current governance framework would be to submit a meta-rule change proposal for community vote.