Hi @oiclid，我是 Spark 委员会的成员 Hanssen。我无意对新增的技术内容作出反馈，虽然这本来应该是我要做的事情。
AI 是强大的工具，而且我们鼓励开发者们使用 AI 来更高效地实现点子，但它不意味着你可以对你的产品毫无概念。你至少需要知道你在做什么，目标用户希望从你的工作中得到什么，从而在 AI 犯错的时候将其纠正回到它应有的方向上。
委员会成员在每位申请者的成果上都需要投入时间和精力，希望能为申请者提供足够的帮助，将项目以更好的形态推向社区。在 AI 普及的当下，诸如 OpenClaw 的项目已经为使用者们提供了亮眼的成果，在 CKB 社区中也已经崭露头角，而以人工为中继和 AI 沟通只会让所有人感到沮丧。
希望能收到更有意义的更新，祝好。
Hi @oiclid, this is Hanssen from the Spark Committee. I have no intention of providing feedback on the newly added technical content, even though that is technically what I’m here to do.
AI is a powerful tool, and we encourage developers to use it to bring their ideas to life more efficiently. However, this does not mean you can afford to have zero conceptual grasp of your own product. You must, at the very least, understand what you are building and what your target users expect from your work. This is the only way you can steer AI back in the right direction when it inevitably veers off course.
Committee members invest significant time and effort into every applicant’s submission, hoping to provide enough support to push projects into the community in their best possible form. In this era of AI ubiquity, projects like OpenClaw have already delivered impressive results and are making a name for themselves within the CKB community. Acting merely as a “human relay” to communicate with AI only leads to frustration for everyone involved.
I look forward to seeing more meaningful updates. Best regards.