Some questions about the recent proposal vote

[Yeti]

@6aea8a80d7fe

I changed accounts, hoping to make you start paying attention to the meaning represented by “identity” in this community, hoping to remind you to think about how dangerous these things are that are packaged as having reference value but actually possess none. I, from my own perspective, unrelated to any organization, am disappointed by this appeal to authority and disgusted by artificial reputation.

Let me be clear: I struggled for a long time whether to vote against that because of the procedural injustice, even though I don’t object to the proposal itself. I believe these people all have good reasons to explain why they are doing this, and the rules (containing massive loopholes) do not prohibit this behavior. Perhaps we should have some consensus on what is ethical, rather than one side using methods with even less integrity than the other to rush towards the abyss of a race to the bottom.

I encourage everyone who is still interested in voting to think about what their own answer is.

I don’t know what this is all about and I’m not sure I really want to know, because it doesn’t sound good…but I’m curious haha

But anyway, back to something CCC related.

Now the Rosen Bridge proposal has passed, are there plans to integrate Cardano and Ergo wallets with CCC?

That seems like it would be the real ‘selling point’ to get users from those chains to use CKB apps, because creating a new wallet, while pretty straightforward, is just too much hassle for most people, unless there’s a really high incentive.