Hi @Alive24,
Thanks for submitting the M3 report. I brought it to the DAO Committee, and there are a few details would like to clarify before moving forward with the M3 payment and project closure.
The M3 scope within the proposal included deploying real test campaigns, testing reward distribution and verification flows with real users, and publishing findings from those tests. The current report notes that the main code deliverables are complete, but describes the real campaign testing as upcoming work rather than completed work.
We’re aware the platform is being used in the AI hackathon, which sounds like it could serve as the test M3 was aiming for. If that’s the case, it would be very helpful to have a brief supplementary report covering how the platform performed during the hackathon (or any other live usage), what was tested, and what the results and takeaways were.
This isn’t about questioning the quality of what’s been built, just want to make sure the milestone record is complete and aligns with the original scope, so the project can close out cleanly.
感谢您提交 M3 报告。我已将其提交给 DAO 委员会，在推进 M3 付款和项目收尾工作之前，有一些细节需要澄清。
M3 的提案范围包括部署真实测试活动、使用真实用户测试奖励分配和验证流程，以及发布这些测试结果。目前的报告指出主要代码交付已完成，但将真实活动测试描述为即将开展的工作，而非已完成的工作。
我们了解到该平台正在 AI 黑客松中使用，这听起来正好可以作为 M3 的测试。如果是这样，那么最好能有一份简短的补充报告，介绍该平台在黑客松（或其他任何实际使用）期间的表现、测试了哪些内容以及结果和收获。
这并非质疑已开发产品的质量，只是想确保里程碑记录完整且与最初范围一致，以便项目能够顺利收尾。