[DIS] CKB Integration for Rosen Bridge

[phroi]

@zz_tovarishch

the difference in CKB amount is because since October '25, in actual execution, payments have been made according to the new CKB price

Linked CKBoost payment was a special case:

@terrytai

V. Special Cases: Approved Proposals with Unfinished Milestones

There is one particularly important and complex issue that requires clarification:

Whether already approved proposals can adopt stablecoin-based pricing.

At present, this situation mainly involves two projects: CKBoost and DAO v1.1.

This issue has been discussed internally at length and presents a genuine dilemma:

• Allowing stablecoin-based pricing would clearly violate Principle 1 (rule integrity)
• Taking no action at all could result in insufficient funding for these projects, potentially preventing completion, which would violate Principle 3

---

VI. Temporary Off-Rule Solution (Personal Action Statement)

As this issue cannot be resolved within the existing rules, we can only seek a temporary solution outside the rule framework.

On a personal basis, I will:

• Donate a portion of CKB
• Reach out to a small number of other donors to help alleviate the funding pressure faced by the above projects during the transitional period

It must be clearly stated that:

• This is my personal action and does not form part of DAO rules
• This action is limited in scope and responsibility
  • There is no guarantee it will be expanded
  • There is no guarantee it will fully offset the impact of price fluctuations
• If the funds raised are insufficient, that outcome will have to be accepted
• Any surplus funds will be fully donated back to the DAO treasury

Additional clarifications:

• This personal subsidy applies only to proposals that have passed final voting (Voting Stage) but have not yet been paid
• It does not apply to new proposals submitted during the transitional period
• Projects with a strong requirement for stablecoin-based pricing are advised to wait until v1.1 officially goes live